Testing of a “baking oven VC” #2

After having tested a so called baking oven VC months ago, I decided to test another one due to verification resasons.

I got the baking oven VC from a german guy who cooked it at 120°C with a 60K silicon fluid.

60K Visco
60K “baking oven VC”

60K VC Testing
first testrun

After the first minutes of the testrun I was absolutely sure, that the VC is missing a lot of fluid, because the chart was much to low for a high 60K viscosity. During the testrun, the air in the VC is mixing with the silion oil as tinny bubbles – which looks like super sparkling mineral water. These tinny bubbles in the fluid reduce the shear force of the silcone oil:

more air = more bubbles = lower effektive viscosity

At a temperature of 135°C the teststand stops automatically for safety resasons. After a short cooling break, we did another testrun at a higher temperature of 155°C – that’s the maximum temperature that should not do any harm to the X-ring sealings. But there was not any signs for a Hump.

Testlauf #1 (135°C)
Testrun#1 (135°C)

Teslauf #2 (155°c)
Testrun #2 (155°c)

I refilled the baking oven VC with 12,5K silicon oil to find out the amount of missing fluid. All in all 20,3g (!) fluid was necessary to get the VC in the correct range of tolerance. Two gram silicon oil increases the hump-temperature in 8°C. This means, that the baking oven VC would have had a theoretical hump-temperature of 200°C. But that’s just theortical, because practical the X-rings would have been damaged at these high temperatures.

20,3g Silikonöl nachgefüllt
+20,3g Silikonöl

Testlauf #3
Testlauf #3


It’s not always that simple, even if it seems so. Some thoughts why the baking temperature can’t be identical with the hump temperature can be found in the last section of the first baking oven test we did months ago.